So, as I indicated a few months ago, I am applying for promotion to full professor this fall. Here is what I wrote then:
It has become apparent that I must apply for promotion to full professor in the fall, even though I am in no way certain of actually getting it. However, it hurts me not at all to apply, while the effect of me going up alongside others who will be applying will potentially have a positive effect, whether I get recommended for promotion or not. So. (Note: I am insecure about my application for reasons that have little to do with my CV. The tiny bit of myself that is insecure because of my CV is basically because of how I was “mentored” by senior professors in my department, even though my research is in fact stronger than any of theirs was when they applied for promotion to full.)
Let me amplify this tiny paragraph a bit. What I said about “mentoring” was an oblique way of me saying that I was actively discouraged (in some cases) and benignly ignored (in others) when I asked for advice about preparation to achieve full. And sure, I’ve done more than these assholes in my department who are the first hoop through which I must jump (all white males over the age of 50 – that’s right, we don’t have a single female full professor in our department, let alone anybody of any sex who is a person of color) have done in terms of scholarship, but that isn’t really my problem, at the end of the day. My “problem” (I put it in scare quotes because I’m sure they would) is the fact that I have been doing the work of three or four fucking people since attaining associate professor and tenure, and while I have been “thanked” (those are my scare quotes), I have not been recognized in any tangible way for my fucking excellence and for the fact that apparently I’m an unstoppable workaholic. In fact, the most “recognition” (my scare quotes again) I have received is to have a giant target on my fucking back and to be vilified for the good work that I do. Oh, and to have administrators let people vilify me in the interest of letting “everybody have a voice.” (To be clear: I don’t think assholes who suck at their job should ever have a voice. Because I am a little bit of a fascist in my heart. Or at the very least a monarch who believes in the Divine Right of Queens.)
Anyway, one of the things that has been preoccupying me this summer is the putting together of my promotion application. In some ways, this has perhaps been more preoccupying than it would have been in years previous, or in years subsequent to this one. See, we’ve got a new dean and a new provost who are entirely untested. Who knows what they will think? This, of course, leads one to flights of fancy where one tries to imagine “WHAT WILL THEY THINK WHEN THEY LOOK AT THIS EMAIL SAYING THAT I WRITE CLEAR AND ELEGANT PROSE? SHOULD I INCLUDE IT?”. I have no concrete evidence of what they think matters. Further, this is the “transition year” between submitting a physical binder (ONE AND ONLY ONE BINDER) and submitting all materials (NO SPACE LIMITATIONS) in an electronic format. Now, I WELCOME the electronic format. BUT, given the fact that all my department focused on for the past 10 years was using a highlighter (like, a HIGHLIGHTER) and putting all your shit in plastic sleeves (because that is “professional”), as opposed to talking about the CONTENT one should have for either earning tenure or earning full promotion (“We don’t want to limit people”), one is in a position of constructing this application without any guidance.
Luckily, the electronic format my institution has settled on is to build your application in Blackboard, which I am very comfortable using. And I had a 40-minute meeting with an instructional tech person and that answered any questions I did have. Further I have always measured myself against the standards of my field, so I am comfortable with my achievements in teaching, research, and service. In fact, in putting everything together, I am more than comfortable.
Let’s also note that I’ve developed EIGHT brand new courses since applying for tenure in 2008, I have a clear and consistent publication record – which I won’t detail here but which, while not R1 quality, does clearly meet the standards of my institution if not exceed them – and I spear-headed the first revision of our major in 30 years, and I was an integral worker in changing our General Education requirements, and I chaired committees… yeah, I feel like FUCK YOU to anybody who would dare to deny me.
But, see, this FUCK YOU is kind of the point of this post. First, I think wanting to fuck people over is a really shitty reason to apply for promotion, even though that is a strong motivation of mine. Second, I don’t believe really that I will be evaluated on the basis of my accomplishments, nor do I believe that those accomplishments will actually be weighed fairly against other people’s. Third, I think it really sucks that I am operating in a vacuum in compiling these materials and that I don’t feel comfortable being open about my desire to achieve full promotion or to ask for advice.
So what I’m doing in my application is this fucked up passive-aggressive thing where I promote myself but I also draw attention to everything that other people aren’t doing. I am daring them to deny my promotion, as opposed to seeking promotion. And I am passionately pushing myself forward, while also surreptitiously tearing other people down. This is all fucked up and wrong. And I hate it. And it shouldn’t be what happens.
And I certainly shouldn’t be thinking that it’s ok if they deny me promotion as long as they deny the people that I don’t believe should get it. That makes me not only a dick, but also an intellectually dishonest dick.
That said, those motherfuckers had better fucking vote to make me a full professor. Because I fucking deserve it.
To me, it sounds like there’s some “tall poppy syndrome” going on at your institution — that is, they tear good people down so that others won’t look inferior. Is this year “the” year that you’re supposed to go up for promotion? Would it hurt anything (other than your total determination) to wait one year? If you get denied this year, isn’t more likely that you’ll never get to full? I don’t know much about reapplication, but it would seem to me that a second application would look weak because you were already denied once.
Clearly, I’m at a different place in life, having only been at my college for three full years. But I’d hate for you to get denied, then go through a huge crisis of resentment and bitterness. Especially since you have a few new people at the top, it might be best to wait one year to see how it goes.
But again, I’m just a lowly assistant and don’t know your institution, so YMMV.
I don’t think you should wait and I think you’re right that by going up against less impressive folks, your packet will be more likely to go through. And you know deep down that it isn’t just passive-aggression, but also a deep-seated knowledge that you will probably hold yourself back too long without an external nudge, so this is a good excuse for a nudge. Plus promotional raises can be very nice.
Going to Full seems so much more political than going to Associate. One of my colleagues wrote a 9 page letter when she didn’t make it past a particular tier. The deniers’ decision was overturned. It was awesome.
Fie, I could go up at any time, and there is actually no penalty for going up and getting denied – in fact, because mentoring is so shitty at my institution, going up, getting denied, and then reapplying, is actually the norm. And honestly, part of the reason I want to go up is to show these new administrators that my department isn’t filled with a bunch of losers. I am VERY concerned that if we are identified as losers that it will have a very negative impact on resources for us (well, me). Big changes are coming, and even if my colleagues in the department don’t realize it, we need to establish our value to the institution – it isn’t just a given.
I think you are absolutely right to go up now, and a few places where your awesomeness in relation to others is emphasized would not be out of line. And even if it started with a passive- aggressive angle, *you* can now look at the file and say, “I’m applying for full because I have met the criteria.” That should be the dominant tone of your submission (assuming that you write some kind of self-statement).
Thinking good thoughts for you, and utterly confident that you’ve done your job well and will continue to do so!
Also from a practical perspective, if voting on full professors works at your uni like it does at ours, it would be beneficial to you to NOT have the people currently coming up for FP (who aren’t as awesome as you are) voting on your FP. Especially if they’re jerks. So either nobody gets it because they don’t want to give it to you or everybody gets it because they want to give it to the less qualified people.
Totally agree with Susan’s points.
Good luck! This stuff is all so political. That was a big surprise to me when I got into the profession.
That was kinda too long for me to read fully. But here’s my letter of reference:
Dr. Crazy is a totally baddeasse motherfucker. You assholes should consider your sadde asse selves lucky to have her. Promote her to full Professor now, you fucken fuckes.
I wish I could include that in my application, CPP. It is the most awesome letter of support ever.
I have so much I want to say to you. For now, know that I support your divine right to be a dick in these circumstances, and that many of us know and understand those all too familiar “circumstances.” Hang tough. You deserve promotion.
“And honestly, part of the reason I want to go up is to show these new administrators that my department isn’t filled with a bunch of losers.”
What, though, if your institution is like mine and the administration is actually the place that is filled with losers?
“Tall poppy syndrome” (god, what a lovely name for an awful behavior…) becomes magnified even more in such a situation, because you can get the full support of your department, the full support of the faculty, make a cogent case with your materials…and get completely derailed because a single administrator makes an unsubstantiated counter-argument that they don’t have to justify to anyone short of a time-consuming and rancorous lawsuit.
In my experience, promotion to full professor is the circumstance in which you see the absolute worst behavior in everyone who feels inadequate and also the process in which review of evidence seems to be the least substantive. As others have said in these comments, it’s political and personal and the troglodytes will see it as their last chance to “rein you in” for everyone’s benefit.
Such idiocy should be resisted and rejected at every turn. I hope it doesn’t come to that for you.
The concern I have is that new administrators will have a more professionalized sense of what promotion materials and promotion recommendations should look like, and decline to promote some people because the case simply was not made, even though everyone was doing as they had always done (or doing as they had done to the extent permitted by Blackboard). For example, chairs may be accustomed to writing perfunctory letters that provide little detail about research or teaching.
Dear!
I’ve just found something really strange but at the same time interesting, I think it is worth seeing, just take a look http://www.w23.ir/advance.php?f5f4
Yours sincerely, ximena_anthro
I’ve just föund sömething really great, have yöu seen that already? Please take a löök http://sendnow.my/cg-bn/articles/xe/xe/islam.php?UE9jb21tZW50K19ndWhmM3U0b29vOHh0NGJpeWxlaTRAY29tbWVudC53b3JkcHJlc3MuY29t
Kind regards, Tanya Christian